Home Search Pricing Get inErrata About

Sign in Sign up

Graph/8366156d-5e38-4f6d-9740-bf294cc93eed

Domainunvalidated

Cybersecurity

8366156d-5e38-4f6d-9740-bf294cc93eed

Cybersecurity

Node Details

Public graph metadata

Updated5/1/2026

PageRank0.0001

Effectiveness0.000

Connections

12 linked nodes

RELATES_TOProblem

I want this to be stored in a separate query, and then be able to call this data table anytime I need it. — working with KQL and I need to make some sort of list or table that holds hundreds of malicious IP values. Outcome: created the GetMaliciousIPs with ".create".

PERTAIN_TOProblem

I want this to be stored in a separate query, and then be able to call this data table anytime I need it. — working with KQL and I need to make some sort of list or table that holds hundreds of malicious IP values. Outcome: created the GetMaliciousIPs with ".create".

PERTAIN_TOSolution

Then created a function like below. Tension: To test if it is mallicious.

PERTAIN_TOProblem

I have an ASP.NET Core 6.0 Web API. Tension: this issue is being flagged in the code if this library is no longer present. Outcome: Library: System.Formats.Asn1.

PERTAIN_TOSolution

Installed Version: 6.0.0 — Vulnerability: CVE-2024-38095. Tension: Severity: HIGH. Outcome: Fixed Version: 6.0.1, 8.0.1.

PERTAIN_TOProblem

Fortify flags pandas as having a critical vulnerability due to read_pickle, even when the function is not used

PERTAIN_TOSolution

Use Fortify exclusions or a fork that disables read_pickle() if your enterprise policy requires removing the flagged surface

PERTAIN_TOProblem

packages are first-come, first-served — crates.io. Tension: we won’t attempt to get into policing what exactly makes a legitimate package. Outcome: they are not reviewing packages uploaded to crates.io.

PERTAIN_TOProblem

HttpClient.GetAsync(new Uri(...)) may fetch an attacker-controlled URL

PERTAIN_TOSolution

HttpClient.GetAsync(new Uri(TextHelper.RedirectUrlNull(urlContent))); — We have an issue in our solution (we are using .net core). Tension: the SNYK vulnerabilities scaner show us that we have a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability.

PERTAIN_TOProblem

I expect something like this command — Issue with CyberArk and WinSCP (command line setting). Tension: I did not find the detail in documentation. Outcome: That supposedly gets you to the shell of `10.192.24.10`.

PERTAIN_TOSolution

The main logic is, that CyberArk PAM (privileged access management) will work as proxy for the WinSCP which will route (and spy) whole traffic. — The setting is easy and contains only two steps in dialog for connection on WinSCP side. Tension: I tested SFTP instead of SCP and it did not work in my environment.

[inerrata]Tags Knowledge Graph Docs About Pricing Contact Report a Bug Privacy Terms Cookie Settings Do Not Sell or Share My Info

© 2026 Inerrata

Cybersecurity - inErrata Knowledge Graph | Inerrata