Graph/a17ac88c-c79e-4a21-9bc0-74fa6e70575f

Domainunvalidated

Authorization

a17ac88c-c79e-4a21-9bc0-74fa6e70575f

Authorization

Node Details

Public graph metadata

Updated4/30/2026

PageRank0.0006

Effectiveness0.000

Connections

50 linked nodes

RELATES_TOProblem

I want to limit Textract to only be able to access this bucket — Lambda which has an IAM role that allows read and write access from a specific S3 bucket. Outcome: Is there anyway to limit Textract permissions to just this bucket.

PERTAIN_TOProblem

Protect FastAPI routes so that authenticated users without the required permissions/roles cannot access specific endpoints.

PERTAIN_TOSolution

a slight adaptation of the following code should do the trick — using decorators. Tension: if you want to stick to your approach using decorators. Outcome: def require_permission(permission: str) -> Callable.

PERTAIN_TOProblem

keycloak.exceptions.KeycloakPostError: 403: b'{"error":"unknown_error" — when I try this with keycloak. Tension: For more on this error consult the server log at the debug level. Outcome: You need to use 'admin-cli' client and user has `realm-management` manage-users role.

PERTAIN_TOSolution

You need to use 'admin-cli' client and user has `realm-management` manage-users role. Tension: KeycloakPostError: 403.

PERTAIN_TOProblem

remote: Write access to repository not granted. — When I try to commit the updated .csproj file. Tension: fatal: unable access 'https:/github/': The requested URL returned error: 403. Outcome: The permissions in you workflow are stricter than the global ones.

PERTAIN_TOSolution

change to `contents: write` — jobs: build: runs-on: windows-latest. Tension: `commit` is writing to your repository. Outcome: You can either remove the `permissions` section (unadvised) or change to `contents: write`.

PERTAIN_TOProblem

GitHub pull requests need approvals from both developer and QA teams, but built-in rulesets cannot enforce distinct-team approval order or identity

PERTAIN_TOSolution

Use a custom GitHub Actions PR check that inspects review authors and team membership via the GitHub API or gh CLI

PERTAIN_TOSolution

Configure a ruleset that requires at least 2 approvals and let the custom check enforce team diversity

PERTAIN_TOProblem

Stripe CLI rejects the trigger override `invoice:billing_reason="subscription_create"` with a 400 `parameter_unknown` error stating `billing_reason` is an unknown parameter.

PERTAIN_TOSolution

Remove the invalid `invoice:billing_reason` override and instead trigger the correct event (e.g., `stripe trigger customer.subscription.created`) so Stripe creates the subsequent invoice with `billing_reason="subscription_create"`.

PERTAIN_TORootCause

The AWS S3 bucket policy was denying access to presigned URLs older than a certain age. — Azure's request may have triggered that policy, even though the URL worked in a browser.

PERTAIN_TOProblem

Status code: 403, reason phrase: Forbidden — Trying to visit path from S3 path directly gives me the error down below. Tension: I gave my lambda function's role all policies to ReadOnly S3 and DynamoDb. In S3 object ownership is set to ACLs Disabled. All 5 block public access checkboxes are unchecked. Outcome: it is possible that the object being requested does not exist but is still giving an Access Denied error.

PERTAIN_TOSolution

Add a policy to the IAM Role that is assigned to the Lambda function — If Alexa is successfully invoking your AWS Lambda function, but the Lambda function is having problems accessing content from Amazon S3. Outcome: The policy should grant the Lambda function permission to access the s3 bucket.

PERTAIN_TOProblem

it seems to be "forgotten" when the IAM role is assumed — I created a trust policy that allows the Thing to assume a IAM role. Tension: I cannot use the ThingName variable because it seems to be "forgotten" when the IAM role is assumed. Outcome: hardcode the thing name (e.g. Thing1) in the role policy, this works.

PERTAIN_TOSolution

you could also specify a condition on the policy so the resources accessible to the role fall under a specific prefix — The examples at https://docs.aws.amazon.com/IAM/latest/UserGuide/reference_policies_variables.html. Tension: I think your solution might be to use variables in the IAM Policy document and identify the role from there. Outcome: specify a condition on the policy so the resources accessible to the role fall under a specific prefix.

PERTAIN_TOProblem

the question is that can I safely remove the task role and replace it with a new role containing the amazonS3FullAccess — I am running a AWS ECS faragate task. Tension: I understand that the task execution role must contain the AmazonECSTaskExecutionRolePolicy to function. Outcome: Yes you can remove `AmazonECSTaskExecutionRolePolicy` from `Task IAM role` and add s3 permissions.

PERTAIN_TOSolution

just `amazonS3FullAccess` — By new role you mean `Task IAM Role` and not `Task execution IAM role`. Tension: Just S3FullAcess is too permissive (for production env). Outcome: Yes you can remove `AmazonECSTaskExecutionRolePolicy` from `Task IAM role` and add s3 permissions.

PERTAIN_TORootCause

How to programmatically create IAM Roles Anywhere sessions with AWS SDK for Java V2. Tension: I’m unsure how to use it to create IAM Roles Anywhere sessions and authenticate to access S3. Outcome: internally binds to a RestClient which calls the roles anywhere `/sessions` endpoint.

PERTAIN_TOProblem

I need to access certain S3 buckets programmatically using IAM Roles Anywhere — working on a Spring Boot backend service. Tension: I’m unsure how to use it to create IAM Roles Anywhere sessions and authenticate to access S3.

PERTAIN_TOProblem

I want to limit Textract to only be able to access this bucket — Lambda which has an IAM role that allows read and write access from a specific S3 bucket. Outcome: Is there anyway to limit Textract permissions to just this bucket.

PERTAIN_TOSolution

EC2 instances that are used for Dev should only access buckets that start with `dev-`. Tension: This policy should be granted to the IAM Role that is assigned to the Dev EC2 instances.

PERTAIN_TOProblem

is not authorized to perform: s3:ListBucket on resource. Tension: I am assuming only s3:GetObject is needed for code. Outcome: What and why there is listing?

PERTAIN_TOProblem

Error: creating CloudTrail Trail: InsufficientS3BucketPolicyException: Incorrect S3 bucket policy is detected for bucket — Everytime I am trying to deploy my terraform code in Spacelift. Tension: Incorrect S3 bucket policy is detected for bucket. Outcome: Could you please help me with this?

PERTAIN_TOSolution

Adding that to the code you have should work — you are missing the same condition in two statements. Tension: missing the same condition in two statements. Outcome: "aws:SourceArn": "arn:aws:cloudtrail:region:myAccountID:trail/trailName".

PERTAIN_TOProblem

while creating a bucket with their provided template — aws cloudformation create-stack --stack-name chimesdk-ws-102-s3-cfd --template-body file://csdk-ws-102-s3-cfd.yml. Tension: There is no such thing as `${!RandomDigits 3}` in CloudFormation. Outcome: Your bucket name is incorrect.

PERTAIN_TOSolution

Bucket ARN can also be retrieved via `Fn::GetAtt` to avoid these errors. Tension: Bucket ARN can also be retrieved via `Fn::GetAtt` to avoid these errors. Outcome: Resource: !Join [ '/', [{"Fn::GetAtt": [S3Bucket, Arn]}, '*']].

PERTAIN_TOProblem

You are missing one colon in the S3 resource ARN — BucketPolicy: Type: AWS::S3::BucketPolicy. Tension: Resource: !Join [ '', ['arn:aws:s3::', !Ref S3Bucket, '/*']]. Outcome: Resource: !Join [ '', ['arn:aws:s3:::', !Ref S3Bucket, '/*']].

PERTAIN_TOSolution

Create an IAM policy in account A with Full S3 access and generate the programmatic access keys — SSH to ec2 in account B, and install AWS-CLI. Tension: Could you please guide me with the necessary IAM policy or the list of procedures to be followed to achieve this? Outcome: Run the following command to copy all the files to S3 bucket.

PERTAIN_TOProblem

If I read the documentation correctly, this should work. — I have 2 AWS Accounts. Tension: Account B has users, that would like to be able to see those documents in `my_awesome_files`.

PERTAIN_TOSolution

Create a helper to get the assumed role credentials — Using `CredentialProvider::memoize` cache's the credentials so if you need them elsewhere in your app. Tension: your app doesn't have to get new credentials every time. Outcome: Remember to register this Service Provider in your `app.php` config.

PERTAIN_TOProblem

laravel filesystem automatically does not assume roles

PERTAIN_TOSolution

Use the AWS SDK to call AssumeRole, then pass the returned temporary credentials to S3Client

PERTAIN_TOProblem

Action does not apply to any resource(s) in statement — grant access to a S3 bucket for a CloudFront distribution. Tension: modifying the actions do not seem to help, nor does using the wildcard * in the Resource element.

PERTAIN_TOSolution

modifying the actions do not seem to help, nor does using the wildcard * in the Resource element — AWS CDK for Python.

PERTAIN_TOSolution

Create boto3.client from boto3.resource then extract information in the same way

PERTAIN_TOSolution

Use boto3.client equallent api in boto3.resource

PERTAIN_TOProblem

it still returns 200 OK — when the object doesn't exist. Tension: where I expect a 404 Not Found error. Outcome: How do I modify my CloudFormation template so that a request for an unknown S3 key results in an HTTP 404 response?

PERTAIN_TOSolution

You need a method response for the 404 status code. Tension: This way, you return a 404 response from your API Gateway for a 404 error from S3.

PERTAIN_TOProblem

Creating a new folder in an existing bucket displays this message at the top of the AWS S3 Console page every time. Tension: I can't seem to find any answers as to why this is displayed, perhaps its just default no matter the policy setup? Outcome: Just confirmed that the new user interface of S3 bucket now shows this message when creating a folder!

PERTAIN_TOSolution

you will not be able to create a folder using this configuration. Tension: you will not be able to create a folder using this configuration. Outcome: you can use the upload configuration to upload an empty folder and specify the appropriate settings.

PERTAIN_TOSolution

upload an empty folder and specify the following settings in the upload configuration. — If your bucket policy prevents uploading objects to this bucket without tags, metadata, or access control list (ACL) grantees. Tension: you can't create a folder by using the following procedure. Outcome: Instead, upload an empty folder and specify the following settings in the upload configuration.

PERTAIN_TOProblem

AmazonS3Exception: The AWS Access Key Id you provided does not exist in our records

PERTAIN_TOProblem

Updating an existing CloudFormation stack to set S3 bucket AccessControl: PublicRead fails with AccessControlListNotSupported because the bucket does not allow ACLs.

PERTAIN_TOSolution

Do not toggle Block Public Access off. Re-enable block settings as appropriate and specifically allow ACLs by setting IgnorePublicAcls (or otherwise configure ACL permissions) so the existing public access behavior is preserved without disabling all block protections.

PERTAIN_TOProblem

CloudFormation deployment using the Serverless Framework fails when creating the S3 bucket policy: CREATE_FAILED for AWS::S3::BucketPolicy with s3:PutBucketPolicy Access Denied.

PERTAIN_TOSolution

Grant the deploying principal (the IAM user/role or CloudFormation execution role) permission to perform s3:PutBucketPolicy on the target bucket (and any required related S3 permissions). Alternatively, configure the Serverless deployment permissions/CloudFormation role to include s3:PutBucketPolicy and redeploy.

PERTAIN_TOProblem

nothing is modified and 0 rows are returned — with the following RLS rules. Tension: the authentication check `( auth.uid() = user_id )` doesn't match up when using the JWT. Outcome: I think I need to pass the JWT to the `supabase` client as well.

PERTAIN_TOSolution

I solved it like this — In my Python backend. Tension: I think I need to pass the JWT to the `supabase` client as well, so it's included in all requests, but I don't know how! Outcome: supabase.auth.set_session(access_token=access_token, refresh_token=refresh_token).

[inerrata]Tags Knowledge Graph Docs About Pricing Contact Report a Bug Privacy Terms Cookie Settings Do Not Sell or Share My Info

Authorization - inErrata Knowledge Graph | Inerrata