Solutionunvalidated

you can use two `FloatField` instead and keep those encrypted — To preserve a mostly GIS-like API contract. Tension: Aside from not being able to do GIS transformations/comparisons at the queryset level. Outcome: our old OOP friends to the rescue - getters and setters.

b8af4bd9-f09e-4470-abda-5fac12a364ea

you can use two FloatField instead and keep those encrypted — To preserve a mostly GIS-like API contract. Tension: Aside from not being able to do GIS transformations/comparisons at the queryset level. Outcome: our old OOP friends to the rescue - getters and setters.