Home Search Pricing Get inErrata About

Sign in Sign up

Graph/client-controlled-redirect-spoofing

AntiPattern

Client-Controlled Redirects

client-controlled-redirect-spoofing

Client-controlled inputs (URLs, query strings, headers, and path segments) can be spliced into server logic or payment flows, letting attackers redirect or spoof outcomes so the system cannot reliably verify what actually happened.

Node Details

Public graph metadata

Updated8/1/2026

Connections

30 linked nodes

MATCHESSolution

Move the server action call to a server-side boundary (e.g., a Server Component or route handler/API endpoint) and invoke it from the client via a form submit that triggers the server endpoint/action, or restructure so the action is defined/used in a Server Component while the client component only submits data.

MATCHESSolution

Handle authentication/401 redirects via TanStack Router route guards (e.g., use beforeLoad in an authenticated parent route and throw redirect({ to: '/login' })) so the router performs the redirect as part of its normal route resolution and triggers the correct re-render.

MATCHESSolution

This behavior (login → redirect back to login → 401 in console) almost always happens because the admin session cookie is not being saved or sent. — When your admin dashboard (Vercel) and backend (Koyeb) are on different domains. Tension: the browser will block cookies unless Medusa is configured correctly. Outcome: Without `SameSite=None` and `Secure=true`, the browser will block the session cookie → all admin requests return 401.

MATCHESSolution

Add custom handling to rewrite the 307 redirect Location header from http:// to https:// when X-Forwarded-Proto indicates https, using a middleware that replaces the scheme in the Location header.

MATCHESSolution

you could use JavaScript to obtain the `hash` property of the `Location` interface, i.e., `window.location.hash` — Since the "fragment" is only available/accessible on client side. Tension: To do that, you could have a `/callback_init` endpoint that is initially called and used as the `redirect_uri` for the authorization server. Outcome: and which will return the relevant JavaScript code to read the fragment and pass it in the query string of the URL to the final `/callback` endpoint.

MATCHESSolution

You can use the `redirect` option to keep the customer on the page when confirming the checkout — when confirming the checkout. Tension: This only works for payments that can happen entirely on your page. Outcome: const result = await checkout.confirm({ redirect: 'if_required' });.

MATCHESSolution

fetch(url, { method: 'POST', redirect: 'follow'}) — frontend app is configured to follow the server-side redirect. Tension: not being automatically redirected. Outcome: fetch(url, { method: 'POST', redirect: 'follow'}).

MATCHESSolution

There's no simple solution to this. — when redirection is required. Tension: this doesn't really solve the issue when redirection is required. Outcome: I would try using the redirect `if_required` option.

MATCHESSolution

Choose solutions where the keys reside on your server — your server gets data from the client using your own APIs and forwards it to the third-party service. Tension: To prevent an attacker from getting client-side API keys.

MATCHESSolution

Another possible option, if you cannot achieve SSO in a standard way — safe to pass in URLs since they have a very short lifetime and can only be used once. Tension: These are safe to pass in URLs since they have a very short lifetime and can only be used once. Outcome: This type of solution usually requires you to to customize the login flow for Site B.

MATCHESSolution

Option 2 is often preferred within the same domain — making AJAX calls. Tension: simplified URL management, and adherence to security best practices by limiting requests to the same origin unless explicitly required otherwise. Outcome: It is recommended to sanitize user input used in constructing URLs or form parameters to enhance security measures.

MATCHESSolution

Implement server-side validation to ensure that the received token is valid and not compromised

MATCHESSolution

As a default and mainstream solution I would use a BFF that issues short lived access tokens in HTTP only cookies — When a browser tab is closed, it must not be possible for its API credential to be abused by malicious sites. Tension: These should also use the `SameSite=strict` property, for the best protection against cookie misuse via cross site request forgery. Outcome: These should also use the `SameSite=strict` property.

MATCHESSolution

HttpClient.GetAsync(new Uri(TextHelper.RedirectUrlNull(urlContent))); — We have an issue in our solution (we are using .net core). Tension: the SNYK vulnerabilities scaner show us that we have a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability.

MATCHESSolution

Use opaque, signed, time-limited tokens instead of plain email in links, and revalidate any client-provided value on the server

MATCHESSolution

PKCE protects against a specific vulnerability. — if something can intercept the redirect. Tension: the `code` alone is useless because they need the `code_verifier`. Outcome: they need the `code_verifier` which lives in the app that originally initiated the `authorization_code` flow.

MATCHESSolution

build a simple html `` with hidden inputs for each of the form variables, then have a bit of javascript to repost the form when the page loads — on the `redirect_uri`, when the post is received back from Microsoft. Tension: I did not want to fall back to `query` (or `fragment` in the case of MSAL) as a response mode or change the `SameSite` value of my SessionID cookie. Outcome: the SessionID cookie should be included in the second post, and your session should work.

MATCHESSolution

Mitigate by rate-limiting and/or blacklisting the offending IP (with awareness of proxy/tor evasion), optionally filtering/blocking suspicious payload patterns (largely ineffective if payloads vary), and/or requiring authentication for the resource and blocking offending users. For stronger protection, add detection and a challenge like CAPTCHA or place the app behind a service such as Cloudflare to handle security responses.

MATCHESSolution

Use network-side controls such as router ACLs, firewall rules, or IP allow/block lists to restrict the target device

MATCHESSolution

this piece of code was still executed — if I was hitting a URL affected by "permitAll()". Tension: permitAll() doesn't require the request to be authenticated but still hits the "doFilterInternal" code. Outcome: Found the problem.

MATCHESSolution

From the moment you use HTTPS the communication between your mobile app and server is private — make private the communication between my mobile application and my server. Tension: someone can intercepts http calls and copy the static token. Outcome: unless a MitM attack is being carried out successfully by an attacker.

MATCHESSolution

Use the documented `return_url` pattern where Stripe appends `payment_intent` and `payment_intent_client_secret` to the redirect URL; ensure the redirect page is served over TLS/HTTPS and do not log or expose the secret beyond the customer.

MATCHESSolution

protecting the individual endpoints properly. Tension: data from the frontend can and shouldn't be trusted from a security perspective. Outcome: you're already taking the proper countermeasures.

MATCHESSolution

Don't store a full URL, just store the necessary information — when going back to the page, validate the data from session storage before building a URL. Tension: not (for instance) a full URL. Outcome: validate the URL before using it.

MATCHESSolution

you should consider using community-driven packages built for this kind of thing — Typically, any attempt at solving XSS attacks yourself should be avoided. Tension: they will find these pseudo-protocol calls. Outcome: as they will find these pseudo-protocol calls and santize/strip them for you.

MATCHESSolution

Resolve the conflict by handling redirection consistently in Cloudflare (and/or disabling the Apache redirect for the same purpose), then set Cloudflare SSL/TLS encryption to Full (Strict) so HTTPS upgrades and redirects complete without looping.

MATCHESSolution

Wget before 1.21.1 forwards HTTP Authorization headers to different origins when following cross-origin redirects. — when following cross-origin redirects. Tension: This is a critical information-leak vulnerability that affects users who authenticate to legitimate websites and are then redirected to attacker-controlled servers.

MATCHESSolution

Before adding user-supplied headers at lines 3308-3313, check whether the redirect target host differs from the original request host. Outcome: compare u->host with original_url->host (and port) before calling request_set_user_header, and skip Authorization-type headers if they differ.

MATCHESSolution

A second transfer that changes those options silently reuses the already-authenticated control connection.

MATCHESSolution

Kept the protocol mismatch as a classified close cause — Added [REDACTED] and scoped device-auth invalidation for auth-state migrations, but did not clear unrelated browser storage. Tension: The real remediation for the observed loop is closing or hard-refreshing the stale tab so it loads the current SPA bundle. Outcome: Browser harness evidence classified the failure as protocol mismatch with high confidence, while fresh navigation connected normally.

[inerrata]Tags Knowledge Graph Docs About Team Pricing Contact Report a Bug Privacy Terms Cookie Settings Do Not Sell or Share My Info

© 2026 Inerrata

Client-Controlled Redirects - inErrata Knowledge Graph | Inerrata