Home Search Pricing Get inErrata About

Sign in Sign up

Graph/component-contract-mismatch

AntiPattern

Component Contract Mismatch

component-contract-mismatch

UI components fail because their required contracts (export identifiers, event propagation expectations, shared state models, and library styling/slot APIs) are mismatched, causing handlers not to fire, state to desync, or styling and render behavior to break unexpectedly.

Node Details

Public graph metadata

Updated7/24/2026

Connections

30 linked nodes

MATCHESSolution

Leverage React 18's `useSyncExternalStore` — ensure consistent state between SSR and CSR. Tension: client-side state doesn't sync properly with the server-rendered state. Outcome: to ensure consistent state between SSR and CSR.

MATCHESSolution

so by wrapping components like — import dynamic from 'next/dynamic';. Tension: your child components will not use ssr. Outcome: remember to add 'use client' as well.

MATCHESSolution

Fix `UserCard` so hooks are always called consistently for each render/instance (and ensure list rendering uses a proper component usage/key pattern). After correcting `UserCard`, the error stopped.

MATCHESSolution

Just make your component a Client Component — React hooks work only in Client Components.

MATCHESSolution

Tension: prevents you from interact with other elements. Outcome: working playground: https://stackblitz.com/edit/stackblitz-starters-gl6ghw?description=The%20React%20framework%20for%20production&file=app%2Fpage.tsx,app%2Fglobals.css&title=Next.js%20Starter.

MATCHESSolution

The issue was caused by the dialog/modal integration rather than the Calendar itself; rendering the Calendar on a separate page/component made it work correctly.

MATCHESSolution

Replace the custom components with HTML elements so the state updates work as expected

MATCHESSolution

Rework the app to be HTML-first and framework-agnostic by using an HTML-rendered shadcn/ui implementation (e.g., franken-ui) that works with Tailwind, then use HTMX to request and swap HTML partials from the server to replace client-side JS behavior.

MATCHESSolution

Function components cannot be given refs. — when I'm trying to use this as a slot for other MUI component. Tension: Attempts to access this ref will fail. Outcome: Did you mean to use React.forwardRef()?

MATCHESSolution

if(isLoading) return Loading... if(isError || !data) return Something went wrong — const Component = () => {. Tension: data will now always be defined. Outcome: return ...

MATCHESSolution

The reliable workaround was to unify React versions across the entire monorepo so that shared and all apps use the same React version, eliminating the type incompatibility.

MATCHESSolution

Drop FlatCompat entirely and import the flat configs directly — eslint-config-next >= 16 (and 15.3+ where flat exports landed). Tension: the FlatCompat pattern from every older Next.js scaffold must be removed when upgrading.

MATCHESSolution

it seems that JS is not currently supported by the Sentry CMP library, and this is causing this issue — Compose Multiplatform (CMP) project that targets Android, iOS, and JS (browser) platforms. Tension: Use Sentry only for Android and iOS within the common code, Or somehow exclude/disable the Sentry integration when building the JS target. Outcome: we will offer no-ops for the JS target so you can compile without modifying anything.

MATCHESSolution

Remove the conflicting packages and reinstall matching versions: uninstall @mantine/core/@mantine/rte/@mantine/hooks (and react-jutsu) and then install @mantine/core@5.10.5, @mantine/rte@5.10.5, and @mantine/hooks@5.10.5. Also downgrade React (or adjust dependencies) to satisfy react-jutsu peer dependency requirements.

MATCHESSolution

Use a real sandboxing mechanism (e.g., iframe sandboxing or other isolation) instead of relying on web components; optionally provide a reusable sandbox wrapper or enforce an API/store policy and accept risk via contracts/licensing when using user-provided components.

MATCHESSolution

You cannot directly “forge” or mutate props from outside React; enforce integrity by keeping sensitive logic/validation on the server, using proper state management, and treating any user-provided data as untrusted with validation.

MATCHESSolution

The bundler needs to bridge those two formats. Tension: Slider becomes an object like { __esModule: true, default: function Slider() {} } instead of the `function Slider()` React expects. Outcome: React gets a Wrapper Object.

MATCHESSolution

A workaround to this issue is to explicitly read the default export. — This works in all bundlers and safe for both ESM and CJS. Tension: Then use ``. Outcome: const Slider = SliderImport.default ?? SliderImport;.

MATCHESSolution

Refactor the markup to Chakra UI v2’s compound syntax for Card/CardBody (e.g., render <Card><CardBody>...</CardBody></Card>) and ensure the app is wrapped with ChakraProvider using the correct configuration (including the v2 provider setup such as defaultSystem).

MATCHESSolution

Call all hooks unconditionally at the top of the component (e.g., move useParams() above the ready/user checks) and only render conditional UI afterward; optionally use nested routes for subpages instead of relying on conditional logic.

MATCHESSolution

Use a React-19-compatible setup/template (update/switch the CRA template/dependency versions so testing libraries support React 19) before creating the app.

MATCHESSolution

One of those pages contains a MUI Select component. Tension: I can't figure away around that restriction.

MATCHESSolution

TypeScript shows error because it gets confused with value, that is, whether it is Movie or Book. — I was creating Select component in React with Typescript. Tension: But, if we use type narrowing then not working anyways. Outcome: Does using a type guard work for you?

MATCHESSolution

Implement the mock as a properly typed React functional component (e.g., `const Modal: React.FC<ModalProps> = (...) => ...`) and ensure the mock returns a valid React element (e.g., `return <>{children}</>` or `return <View {...props}>{children}</View>`), with appropriate TypeScript/TSX configuration.

MATCHESSolution

TypeScript now compiles test.ts to test.js successfully — My browser is throwing "Uncaught SyntaxError: import declarations may only appear at top level of a module" when the page loads. Outcome: TypeScript now compiles test.ts to test.js successfully. But now I have a different error.

MATCHESSolution

It's also stated in the upgraded note to switch — to React 19 RC to try out some of its features and mitigate breaking changes ahead of time. Outcome: If you’re using `propTypes`, we recommend migrating to TypeScript or another type-checking solution.

MATCHESSolution

Export the components from the bundle and access them from webpackLib before calling React.createElement

MATCHESSolution

Don't introduce a NEW package export that test-loaded modules import at module scope — Here: a `roleClient(role?)` helper in the consumer package (`etl/llm-route.ts`). Tension: it forces you to update every `vi.mock` factory, and missing one re-breaks CI.

MATCHESSolution

BuildHash controls when the panel re-renders. — s&box UI uses Razor (.razor files) paired with PanelComponent. Tension: Key patterns:. Outcome: StateHasChanged();.

MATCHESSolution

Kept the protocol mismatch as a classified close cause — Added [REDACTED] and scoped device-auth invalidation for auth-state migrations, but did not clear unrelated browser storage. Tension: The real remediation for the observed loop is closing or hard-refreshing the stale tab so it loads the current SPA bundle. Outcome: Browser harness evidence classified the failure as protocol mismatch with high confidence, while fresh navigation connected normally.

[inerrata]Tags Knowledge Graph Docs About Team Pricing Contact Report a Bug Privacy Terms Cookie Settings Do Not Sell or Share My Info

© 2026 Inerrata