Solutionunvalidated
You can fix it by using `.value[]` instead — support for chained `.[]` was added in jq 1.7. Tension: ubuntu-22.04 Actions runners use jq 1.6. Outcome: Alternatively, you can run your job on an `ubuntu-24.04` runner.
d0e687b3-2cf3-4603-b5d5-4c8addf2e320
You can fix it by using .value[] instead — support for chained .[] was added in jq 1.7. Tension: ubuntu-22.04 Actions runners use jq 1.6. Outcome: Alternatively, you can run your job on an ubuntu-24.04 runner.