Home Search Pricing Get inErrata About

Sign in Sign up

Graph/redux-toolkit-wiring-mismatch

AntiPattern

Slice Wiring Semantics Mismatch

redux-toolkit-wiring-mismatch

Redux Toolkit features fail when action types, listener triggers, and state reducers aren’t wired to the exact shapes the tooling expects, so dispatched events never match, devtools can’t attribute stores, and fulfilled mutations never update state.

Node Details

Public graph metadata

Updated6/29/2026

Connections

30 linked nodes

MATCHESSolution

Leverage React 18's `useSyncExternalStore` — ensure consistent state between SSR and CSR. Tension: client-side state doesn't sync properly with the server-rendered state. Outcome: to ensure consistent state between SSR and CSR.

MATCHESSolution

Properly mock the Zustand store module by spying on/overriding the store export (the Zustand `create` result or the correct store factory export) to return a custom state and action implementation, then render the component and assert against the mocked behavior.

MATCHESSolution

it is technically not needed to add `dispatch` to dependency lists in Redux — rather than ignoring/suppressing ESLint's warnings. Tension: it is still a much better practice to include it anyway. Outcome: always follow what the ESLint rule says.

MATCHESSolution

Tension: prevents you from interact with other elements. Outcome: working playground: https://stackblitz.com/edit/stackblitz-starters-gl6ghw?description=The%20React%20framework%20for%20production&file=app%2Fpage.tsx,app%2Fglobals.css&title=Next.js%20Starter.

MATCHESSolution

Replace the custom components with HTML elements so the state updates work as expected

MATCHESSolution

Function components cannot be given refs. — when I'm trying to use this as a slot for other MUI component. Tension: Attempts to access this ref will fail. Outcome: Did you mean to use React.forwardRef()?

MATCHESSolution

I'm playing around with NextJS app router, and Suspense — In my App router page. Tension: this suspense boundary won't do anything.

MATCHESSolution

in v5 options are part of the same object — I was writing syntax according to react query v4. Outcome: Refactored the code like this.

MATCHESSolution

Write unit tests for the Redux state reducers/slices directly by calling the reducer with the action and asserting the resulting state, rather than relying solely on component-level store assertions.

MATCHESSolution

Add Reactotron using it as a store enhancer (e.g., via store `enhancers: [Reactotron.createEnhancer()]`) and ensure it’s configured/used with the Redux store instance before calling `.connect()`.

MATCHESSolution

Align the state interface with the real thunk payload types (use `Goal[]` instead of `[]`) and explicitly type/cast the thunk `fulfilled` payload and the reducer `action` (including casting `action.error` to `string`).

MATCHESSolution

you need to use the specific customized `AppDispatch` type from the store — For `useDispatch`, the default `Dispatch` type does not know about thunks. Outcome: Update your `src/Client/RedGranite.Client.Web/src/app/hooks.ts` file to the current suggestion.

MATCHESSolution

Update the selector to read from the correct key, e.g. useSelector((state) => state.fileUpload.files), or change the store reducer key to match the selector.

MATCHESSolution

I want to show the data of customers from Redux — when I use `useSelect` to retrieve the data from the store. Tension: entries.map is not a function. Outcome: retrieve the data from the store.

MATCHESSolution

Dispatch actions using the correct namespaced `type`, e.g. `dispatch({ type: `transactions/${action}`, amount })`, or ensure `action` already includes the `transactions/` prefix.

MATCHESSolution

Tension: cannot itself access any Redux context because none is provided to it from higher up the ReactTree. Outcome: so it can access the provided Redux context.

MATCHESSolution

You are not allowed in Redux, ever, to dispatch from inside a reducer. — Reducer logic has to be a pure synchronous function without side effects. Tension: You might want to do the logic you are currently doing in a thunk or with the listener middleware instead. Outcome: You have to use `createAsyncThunk` for that.

MATCHESSolution

Install the Redux DevTools browser extension and rerun the app so `composeWithDevTools` can work correctly.

MATCHESSolution

An async function was passed to useActionState.

MATCHESSolution

Redux-Toolkit also ships with Thunk middleware included and enabled by default — If you needed to configure and/or add middleware, use the `getDefaultMiddleware` utility.

MATCHESSolution

Rewrite store initialization to correctly create saga middleware and pass rootReducer plus middleware to createStore (e.g., use sagaMiddleware.run(rootSaga) and createStore(rootReducer, applyMiddleware(sagaMiddleware)).

MATCHESSolution

convert the object into the builder callback syntax — createSlice({ name, initialState, reducers: { /* case reducers here */ },. Tension: object syntax for `createSlice.extraReducers` has been deprecated. Outcome: builder => { builder.addCase(todoAdded, (state, action) => {}) }.

MATCHESSolution

resolve npm install @reduxjs/toolkit@^1.9.6 — in my Expo project. Tension: createSlice is not a function (it is undefined). Outcome: npm install @reduxjs/toolkit@^1.9.6.

MATCHESSolution

Use the reducer exported by createSlice in configureStore; the store gets the initial state from that reducer

MATCHESSolution

Update the reducer logic to access into `action.payload.applicationUser` property. — Redux-Toolkit slice reducers. Tension: the reducer is accessing some `user` property that doesn't exist in the response object. Outcome: Mutate state directly.

MATCHESSolution

Add extraReducers/addMatchers for each mutation endpoint (addTour, editTour, removeTour) to update `state.tour` on `matchFulfilled`, or use RTK Query tags and invalidation so queries refetch and state stays in sync.

MATCHESSolution

You cannot directly “forge” or mutate props from outside React; enforce integrity by keeping sensitive logic/validation on the server, using proper state management, and treating any user-provided data as untrusted with validation.

MATCHESSolution

The bundler needs to bridge those two formats. Tension: Slider becomes an object like { __esModule: true, default: function Slider() {} } instead of the `function Slider()` React expects. Outcome: React gets a Wrapper Object.

MATCHESSolution

TypeScript shows error because it gets confused with value, that is, whether it is Movie or Book. — I was creating Select component in React with Typescript. Tension: But, if we use type narrowing then not working anyways. Outcome: Does using a type guard work for you?

MATCHESSolution

It's also stated in the upgraded note to switch — to React 19 RC to try out some of its features and mitigate breaking changes ahead of time. Outcome: If you’re using `propTypes`, we recommend migrating to TypeScript or another type-checking solution.

[inerrata]Tags Knowledge Graph Docs About Team Pricing Contact Report a Bug Privacy Terms Cookie Settings Do Not Sell or Share My Info

© 2026 Inerrata

Slice Wiring Semantics Mismatch - inErrata Knowledge Graph | Inerrata