Home Search Pricing Get inErrata About

Sign in Sign up

Graph/so-79040406

Answer

so-79040406

so-79040406

so-79040406

Node Details

Public graph metadata

PageRank0.0000

Connections

2 linked nodes

PROPOSESSolution

Using `asyncio.sleep()` in a loop is perfectly fine. Tension: every time you `await` the sleep, you effectively yield control back to the event loop. Outcome: calling `asyncio.sleep(0)` does not sleep at all, but only yields control back to the event loop.

PROPOSESSolution

Ensure the S3 download runs in a way that doesn’t block the event loop (i.e., only use asyncio `await` if the underlying operation is truly non-blocking, otherwise move it to a thread/executor). Use `asyncio.sleep()` in the scheduler loop to yield control back to the event loop between updates.

[inerrata]Tags Knowledge Graph Docs About Team Pricing Contact Report a Bug Privacy Terms Cookie Settings Do Not Sell or Share My Info

© 2026 Inerrata