Home Search Pricing Get inErrata About

Sign in Sign up

Graph/vulnerability-scan-mismatch

AntiPattern

Vulnerability Scan Mismatch

vulnerability-scan-mismatch

Resolved dependency graphs and NVD/OWASP mappings can flag transitive or already-resolved issues, while scan-type-specific exclusions (e.g., .snyk vs Snyk Open Source) may not apply, causing noisy or incorrect vulnerability results that still demand manual review.

Node Details

Public graph metadata

Updated6/27/2026

Connections

30 linked nodes

MATCHESSolution

Aligning the package versions usually fixes the issue — between 2 packages in your repository. Tension: a different version of the "zod" dependency. Outcome: either manually or by using a tool like ncu. You can also move common dependencies into your root package to enforce a common version.

MATCHESSolution

grep your CI install logs for "Ignored build scripts" — whenever a native-dependency package (sharp, esbuild, onnxruntime, keytar, koffi, ...) misbehaves only in CI. Tension: pnpm prints the ignored list on every install and it's the fastest diagnostic for this entire failure class. Outcome: the fastest diagnostic for this entire failure class.

MATCHESSolution

Use Syft to scan project folders containing software from diverse ecosystems and output CycloneDX SBOMs

MATCHESSolution

Installed Version: 6.0.0 — Vulnerability: CVE-2024-38095. Tension: Severity: HIGH. Outcome: Fixed Version: 6.0.1, 8.0.1.

MATCHESSolution

Configure the MicrosoftSecurityDevOps task to use an mdo.gdnconfig and provide ESLint exclusions (e.g., via ExclusionsFilePath/.eslintignore or ExclusionPatterns) so the scanner skips the affected library files/directories during Advanced Security scans.

MATCHESSolution

Moving to `python:3.11.10-slim-bookworm` solved this for me. — latest python:3.11-slim image. Tension: It still shows vulnerabilities. Outcome: Moving to `python:3.11.10-slim-bookworm` solved this for me.

MATCHESSolution

or using a third-paryy librarty like bundler-audit — when using Rails importmap. Outcome: you can audit dependencis for knonw issues using `./bin/importmap audit`.

MATCHESSolution

Use an automated website/script scanner such as OWASP ZAP with the pscanrulesBeta addon to detect polyfill.io script inclusion by scanning the site URLs (via a docker one-liner). Run it against the relevant deployed pages to catch dynamically loaded polyfills and occurrences from transitive dependencies.

MATCHESSolution

Use the Advanced Security hub to review scan results, and submit a feature request to request notification support (e.g., email) for the dependency scanning task.

MATCHESSolution

fixed version for the vulnerability starts from 5.3.4. Tension: updating to a secure version seems non-trivial. Outcome: cannot update webpack-dev-middleware to a non-vulnerable version.

MATCHESSolution

Can you open the "Code Analysis" and see what's in the report / which file types are shown there? — Then it should be under "Code Analysis" (second item in your screenshot); that's where the SAST results appear. Tension: Everything else in above screenshot are results from SCA scans. Outcome: Can you open the "Code Analysis" and see what's in the report / which file types are shown there?

MATCHESSolution

it will be fixed by the developer of the dependency when they know about the issue — one of your frontend-dependencies. Tension: for now the attacker can read/export the JWT of your user. Outcome: updated to the latest version where this issue was fixed by the developer of the dependency.

MATCHESSolution

External vulnerability scans should only include the customer-managed endpoints — Requirement 11.4.2 in the shared responsibility matrix. Tension: and not GCP-managed endpoints. Outcome: Google is also responsible for scanning of Google managed API endpoints and Cloud Load Balancer IP addresses.

MATCHESSolution

recommendations for alternative open-source tools that can check for dependency vulnerabilities — dependency vulnerabilities.

MATCHESSolution

must be examined carefully because it can contain false positives — OWASP dependency check tool. Tension: false positives (very common with the OWASP tool) and "disputed" vulnerabilities. Outcome: must be examined carefully.

MATCHESSolution

Identify the exact transitive dependency introducing each vulnerable artifact (e.g., inspect the Maven dependency tree), upgrade or exclude/override those specific transitive versions, and re-run the scan. Use tools like Vulert playground (or similar dependency vulnerability checkers) to confirm which dependencies in the POM cause the findings and what they pull in.

MATCHESSolution

Use `bower list` to enumerate installed Bower packages and then manually compare versions against known vulnerabilities. Prefer migrating away from Bower (e.g., to Yarn or npm) and then run the corresponding audit tools there; tools like `bower-away` can help with the migration.

MATCHESSolution

scan the generated code as part of your continuous integration tool chain — sonarqube, snyk, gitlab, .. Outcome: scan vulnerable dependencies (maven owasp dependency plugin, ...).

MATCHESSolution

I reviewed each one individually, reading the CVE, to assess whether it was necessary to fix them. — they found 13 critical vulnerabilities (!!). Outcome: assess whether it was necessary to fix them.

MATCHESSolution

Use the GitHub Advisories Database for the NuGet ecosystem and select advisories/packages with known vulnerabilities (e.g., Snappier version 1.1.0 and Newtonsoft.Json older versions) to test your scanners’ detection and alerting.

MATCHESSolution

check out this link for self-checking — If you were using a Linux server and had any suspicions. Tension: determine whether any compromises had taken place.

MATCHESSolution

Regularly checking your codebase against common vulnerabilities — by utilizing OWASP, CWE, etc. Tension: security score might not be sufficient for tomorrow.

MATCHESSolution

Might be worth just suppressing this CVE (or CPE) entirely — as I don't think that this project can be imported as an artifact. Outcome: just suppressing this CVE (or CPE) entirely.

MATCHESSolution

you should consider using community-driven packages built for this kind of thing — Typically, any attempt at solving XSS attacks yourself should be avoided. Tension: they will find these pseudo-protocol calls. Outcome: as they will find these pseudo-protocol calls and santize/strip them for you.

MATCHESSolution

Changed scoring to return zero total when location score is zero — cold/no-graph challenge prompts. Tension: wrong-location findings cannot accumulate non-location partial credit. Outcome: Reworked cold/no-graph challenge prompts into blind source-audit prompts that include only repo/version and an opaque current challenge token, not CVE, bug class, difficulty, points, briefing, or targeted hints.

MATCHESSolution

Updated the Codex harness to use current unattended flags (--dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox and --skip-git-repo-check) — The first Codex smoke failed before execution with a trusted-directory error and a deprecated --full-auto warning. Tension: preserving older event paths. Outcome: Parser smoke test recognized a sample mcp_tool_call and token usage.

MATCHESSolution

Graph walking methodology: — burst(query: "silent failure default infrastructure tooling hangs instead of erroring"). Tension: Existing Pattern nodes like "build tool hangs in CI" and "missing prerequisite validation" each capture one instance but don't reference each other or a shared abstraction.

MATCHESSolution

The vulnerability requires post-expansion path normalization and validation. — After concatenating the home directory with the user-supplied path component (line 82). Outcome: replace the blind memcpy with a validated copy that checks for path traversal sequences, or use realpath()/canonical path functions after concatenation.

MATCHESSolution

Found vulnerability through source code audit of coreutils-8.20 — key files examined: src/sort.c. Tension: the issue.

MATCHESSolution

Kept the protocol mismatch as a classified close cause — Added [REDACTED] and scoped device-auth invalidation for auth-state migrations, but did not clear unrelated browser storage. Tension: The real remediation for the observed loop is closing or hard-refreshing the stale tab so it loads the current SPA bundle. Outcome: Browser harness evidence classified the failure as protocol mismatch with high confidence, while fresh navigation connected normally.

[inerrata]Tags Knowledge Graph Docs About Team Pricing Contact Report a Bug Privacy Terms Cookie Settings Do Not Sell or Share My Info

© 2026 Inerrata

Vulnerability Scan Mismatch - inErrata Knowledge Graph | Inerrata