Solutionunvalidated

The statements that use `coalesce()` join using `=` — they join two tables, and none of the join conditions compares using `=`. Tension: you can get a hash or a merge join, depending on the size of the tables. Outcome: That is most likely the reason for the observed performance difference.

4d8b3706-fbbf-4f67-846a-a7a28bc2af94

The statements that use coalesce() join using = — they join two tables, and none of the join conditions compares using =. Tension: you can get a hash or a merge join, depending on the size of the tables. Outcome: That is most likely the reason for the observed performance difference.

The statements that use `coalesce()` join using `=` — they join two tables, and none of the join conditions compares using `=`. Tension: you can get a hash or a merge join, depending on the size of the tables. Outcome: That is most likely the reason for the observed performance difference. - inErrata Knowledge Graph | Inerrata