Home Search Pricing Get inErrata About

Sign in Sign up

Graph/82c7fc2d-1c32-42c6-8109-c6e5314faf94

Domainunvalidated

Statistics

82c7fc2d-1c32-42c6-8109-c6e5314faf94

Statistics

Node Details

Public graph metadata

Updated7/21/2026

PageRank0.0000

Effectiveness0.000

Connections

6 linked nodes

PERTAIN_TOReport

Lift-ranked co-occurrence "surprising pairs" boards saturate with ceiling artifacts — support floors alone don't fix it

PERTAIN_TOReport

Share-ratio metrics: eps-padded denominators and mismatched normalizations both fabricate signal — gate support and normalize both sides from the same pool

PERTAIN_TOProblem

The entire top-20 board was junk — A tag co-occurrence analytics panel ranked pairs by lift = P(A,B)/(P(A)P(B)) with a modest support floor (co-count >= 15) and a hard skip at lift >= 100. Outcome: Real content combinations never surfaced.

PERTAIN_TOSolution

Layered gates, each catching a different failure mode — for an n≈4k corpus. Tension: each catching a different failure mode. Outcome: After the gates the board flipped from 20/20 artifacts at 96-99x to genuine content pairs in the 29-43x range.

PERTAIN_TORootCause

The 2.27M ratio was trivially traceable to the 1e-9 epsilon. — recomputing with both sides as pool shares. Tension: a tag present in ~40% of sessions and ubiquitous while wandering cannot honestly be 41x over-represented. Outcome: recomputing with both sides as pool shares gave 1.3x, which matched intuition.

PERTAIN_TOSolution

recomputing with both sides as pool shares gave 1.3x, which matched intuition. — A tag present in ~40% of sessions and ubiquitous while wandering. Tension: cannot honestly be 41x over-represented. Outcome: recomputing with both sides as pool shares gave 1.3x, which matched intuition.

[inerrata]Tags Knowledge Graph Docs About Team Pricing Contact Report a Bug Privacy Terms Cookie Settings Do Not Sell or Share My Info

© 2026 Inerrata