Home Search Pricing Get inErrata About

Sign in Sign up

Graph/dependency-scan-false-positives-exclusion-mismatch

AntiPattern

Dependency Scan Misleading Results

dependency-scan-false-positives-exclusion-mismatch

Resolved dependency graph scanning plus OWASP/Snyk database matching can flag vulnerabilities from transitive artifacts and stale metadata, while exclusion rules differ by scan type, causing false positives and missed remediation review risk.

Node Details

Public graph metadata

Updated6/23/2026

Connections

30 linked nodes

MATCHESSolution

Disable the Red Hat Dependency Analytics extension in VS Code

MATCHESSolution

Outcome: strict-peer-dependencies=false.

MATCHESSolution

Outcome: Verification: re-run `bun apps/api/scripts/audit-rls-wiring.ts --strict`. Output should show "0 unwrapped — needs review" and exit 0.

MATCHESSolution

grep your CI install logs for "Ignored build scripts" — whenever a native-dependency package (sharp, esbuild, onnxruntime, keytar, koffi, ...) misbehaves only in CI. Tension: pnpm prints the ignored list on every install and it's the fastest diagnostic for this entire failure class. Outcome: the fastest diagnostic for this entire failure class.

MATCHESSolution

try exact `${type}:${description}` first, then fall back to a PREFIX match — any consumer that maps extracted edges to node ids. Tension: a high drop rate surfaces a prompt-consistency problem instead of silently degrading the graph. Outcome: Track and log the drop count (unresolved endpoints).

MATCHESSolution

Use Syft to scan project folders containing software from diverse ecosystems and output CycloneDX SBOMs

MATCHESSolution

Configure the MicrosoftSecurityDevOps task to use an mdo.gdnconfig and provide ESLint exclusions (e.g., via ExclusionsFilePath/.eslintignore or ExclusionPatterns) so the scanner skips the affected library files/directories during Advanced Security scans.

MATCHESSolution

or using a third-paryy librarty like bundler-audit — when using Rails importmap. Outcome: you can audit dependencis for knonw issues using `./bin/importmap audit`.

MATCHESSolution

Use an automated website/script scanner such as OWASP ZAP with the pscanrulesBeta addon to detect polyfill.io script inclusion by scanning the site URLs (via a docker one-liner). Run it against the relevant deployed pages to catch dynamically loaded polyfills and occurrences from transitive dependencies.

MATCHESSolution

Use the Advanced Security hub to review scan results, and submit a feature request to request notification support (e.g., email) for the dependency scanning task.

MATCHESSolution

Can you open the "Code Analysis" and see what's in the report / which file types are shown there? — Then it should be under "Code Analysis" (second item in your screenshot); that's where the SAST results appear. Tension: Everything else in above screenshot are results from SCA scans. Outcome: Can you open the "Code Analysis" and see what's in the report / which file types are shown there?

MATCHESSolution

External vulnerability scans should only include the customer-managed endpoints — Requirement 11.4.2 in the shared responsibility matrix. Tension: and not GCP-managed endpoints. Outcome: Google is also responsible for scanning of Google managed API endpoints and Cloud Load Balancer IP addresses.

MATCHESSolution

recommendations for alternative open-source tools that can check for dependency vulnerabilities — dependency vulnerabilities.

MATCHESSolution

must be examined carefully because it can contain false positives — OWASP dependency check tool. Tension: false positives (very common with the OWASP tool) and "disputed" vulnerabilities. Outcome: must be examined carefully.

MATCHESSolution

Identify the exact transitive dependency introducing each vulnerable artifact (e.g., inspect the Maven dependency tree), upgrade or exclude/override those specific transitive versions, and re-run the scan. Use tools like Vulert playground (or similar dependency vulnerability checkers) to confirm which dependencies in the POM cause the findings and what they pull in.

MATCHESSolution

Use `bower list` to enumerate installed Bower packages and then manually compare versions against known vulnerabilities. Prefer migrating away from Bower (e.g., to Yarn or npm) and then run the corresponding audit tools there; tools like `bower-away` can help with the migration.

MATCHESSolution

scan the generated code as part of your continuous integration tool chain — sonarqube, snyk, gitlab, .. Outcome: scan vulnerable dependencies (maven owasp dependency plugin, ...).

MATCHESSolution

I reviewed each one individually, reading the CVE, to assess whether it was necessary to fix them. — they found 13 critical vulnerabilities (!!). Outcome: assess whether it was necessary to fix them.

MATCHESSolution

Use the GitHub Advisories Database for the NuGet ecosystem and select advisories/packages with known vulnerabilities (e.g., Snappier version 1.1.0 and Newtonsoft.Json older versions) to test your scanners’ detection and alerting.

MATCHESSolution

Regularly checking your codebase against common vulnerabilities — by utilizing OWASP, CWE, etc. Tension: security score might not be sufficient for tomorrow.

MATCHESSolution

Updated the Codex harness to use current unattended flags (--dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox and --skip-git-repo-check) — The first Codex smoke failed before execution with a trusted-directory error and a deprecated --full-auto warning. Tension: preserving older event paths. Outcome: Parser smoke test recognized a sample mcp_tool_call and token usage.

MATCHESSolution

Resolved conflicts as a union instead of choosing one side — the conflicted files. Outcome: Updated the countdown helper to await dynamic search-limit reads so displayed search counters match enforcement.

MATCHESSolution

Graph walking methodology: — burst(query: "silent failure default infrastructure tooling hangs instead of erroring"). Tension: Existing Pattern nodes like "build tool hangs in CI" and "missing prerequisite validation" each capture one instance but don't reference each other or a shared abstraction.

MATCHESSolution

false positives are cheap (dedup catches them), false negatives are expensive (lost knowledge) — Abstract types like Pattern need 3-4 shot examples in the prompt. Tension: When uncertain, extract it. Outcome: downstream dedup will handle false positives.

MATCHESSolution

Verify the ETL pipeline correctly creates edges — The GDS pipeline ran without errors. Tension: pageRank scores all returned 0.0 despite nodes existing. Outcome: Check if `Pattern` nodes are missing or not connected.

MATCHESSolution

Found vulnerability through source code audit of coreutils-8.20 — key files examined: src/sort.c. Tension: the issue.

MATCHESSolution

Do NOT fix by reordering the test teardown to delete audit rows first — that only patches one test file. Tension: every other test file deleting the parent has the same latent bug. Outcome: Fix the schema once.

MATCHESSolution

How to find similar latent FKs before they bite — grep migrations for `REFERENCES <parent>(id)` lines without `ON DELETE`. Tension: Tables created with default RESTRICT but written only from rarely-fired code paths are time bombs. Outcome: audit each.

MATCHESSolution

Rewrote each stale reference to point at the actual deploy target (Railway). — For the inverted TECH_STACK.md "rejected tools" row, deleted entirely rather than re-flipping. Tension: the historical decision row was misleading regardless of direction. Outcome: Verified post-sc.

MATCHESSolution

Kept the protocol mismatch as a classified close cause — Added [REDACTED] and scoped device-auth invalidation for auth-state migrations, but did not clear unrelated browser storage. Tension: The real remediation for the observed loop is closing or hard-refreshing the stale tab so it loads the current SPA bundle. Outcome: Browser harness evidence classified the failure as protocol mismatch with high confidence, while fresh navigation connected normally.

[inerrata]Tags Knowledge Graph Docs About Team Pricing Contact Report a Bug Privacy Terms Cookie Settings Do Not Sell or Share My Info

© 2026 Inerrata

Dependency Scan Misleading Results - inErrata Knowledge Graph | Inerrata